PDA

View Full Version : Region of Waterloo Considers Living Wage



Spokes
01-06-2010, 06:53 PM
Region of Waterloo Considers Living Wage

Recapping:

'It is the right thing to do'
Region considers pros and cons of introducing a living-wage policy

August 18, 2008
Frances Barrick
RECORD STAFF

WATERLOO REGION - Waterloo Region's practice of contracting out work may cost more if it adopts a living-wage policy to help fight poverty.

The principle behind living wage is that workers should be paid enough to live without needing social assistance or going to food banks.

While 125 American cities have some form of living-wage policy, no Canadian municipality has come on-board. Tomorrow, regional councillors will receive a staff report recommending that the living-wage rate for the region be $13.62 an hour. Ontario's minimum wage is $8.75 an hour. It will rise to $10.25 in 2010.

"It is an important issue because most Canadians believe that if you work full time, you should be paid enough to live on," said Brice Balmer, chair of Opportunities Waterloo Region, a group that advocates solutions to poverty.

The report says council will have to calculate the cost of a living-wage policy before deciding whether companies that supply goods and services to the region will be required to pay this living wage.

There would be no additional cost if a living-wage policy pertained only to regional employees as they already make more than $13.62 an hour, the report says. Only summer and co-op students may earn less.

But there is a cost if the region decides to extend the policy to contracted-out work. For example, the region spends $1.7 million a year to contract out janitorial services. Cleaning companies pay workers about $9 an hour.

These costs could jump to $2.5 million if companies doing business with the region must pay their employees a living wage. "The government has a responsibility to make sure that people who are working for the government . . . are being paid a fair wage," Balmer said.

Opportunities Waterloo Region calculated the hourly rate of $13.62 based on the local cost of housing, food, transportation, clothing and other expenses. The $13.62 rate "is an estimated amount that we believe a person can live modestly on," said Mary MacKeigan, executive director of Opportunities Waterloo Region.

A person working 40 hours a week at that rate would earn a gross annual salary of $28,333.

Calgary and Hamilton and the Town of Pelham in Niagara Region are also considering living-wage policies

A study of 20 American cities with living-wage policies found that budget forecasts significantly overestimated the actual cost of implementation. Contract costs for these cities increased by less than 0.1 per cent and companies bidding on municipal work absorbed the additional cost, the regional report said.

In 1994, Baltimore became the first American city to embrace living wage.

"It has been completely affordable," said Sheldon Shugarman, executive director of Baltimore's wage commission. "The impact was less than one per cent," he said.

Proponents of living wage say it reduces poverty, decreases absenteeism and gives workers a greater sense of self-worth and connection to their communities. It would also provide a level playing field in the bidding process as it would prevent companies from paying low wages to keep costs down to win municipal contracts.

In Calgary, where living wage has become a contentious issue, small businesses argue it would hurt the people it is supposed to help as decreased profits would mean fewer jobs and more layoffs, said Derek Cook, a social planner with the city.

The moral issue, Cook said, is whether "public money should be going to companies that are paying wages low enough that these people working are really living in poverty."

Art Sinclair, director of economic development for the Chamber of Commerce of Kitchener-Waterloo, said while his knowledge of living wage is limited, he said the chamber is always interested in exploring poverty-cutting options.

The region plans to gather public input on the issue and Sinclair said the chamber would want to participate.

Latest census data shows that while local families enjoy the seventh-highest incomes in 2005, about 48,000 residents live in poverty. In 2001, there were 5,110 people in the region working full-time who were considered to be living in poverty, the report said.

As executive director of Opportunities Waterloo Region, MacKeigan said she's often asked why governments should implement fair wage policies.

"I say because it is the right thing to do," she said.

fbarrick@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/400632 (http://news.therecord.com/article/400632)


Region takes cautious stance on living wage

August 20, 2008
Jeff Outhit
RECORD STAFF

WATERLOO REGION - Cautious regional councillors are moving slowly toward hiking the minimum wage for regional employees.

Under a 'living wage' proposal, people working for regional taxpayers, on staff or contract, would have to be paid at least $13.62 an hour. Regional employees already earn this hourly wage but some contracted employees, such as janitors, do not.

Ontario's minimum wage is $8.75, rising to $10.25 in 2010.

The living wage, calculated to sustain a single adult, is intended to fight poverty by putting upward pressure on wages.

"I think it's a great opportunity to reduce poverty in our community with a minimal impact on taxpayers," said Coun. Sean Strickland, of Waterloo.

Councillors expressed support for the concept yesterday, but said they want more research before approving the plan. There's also concern about public reaction.

Coun. Jane Brewer, of Cambridge, asked if this should be a provincial initiative. "I'm struggling with this," she said.

Regional staff will develop a plan to research implications on taxpayer costs and jobs. They will propose ways to consult with the public.

"We are not talking about imposing a mandatory minimum wage in the region," Chair Ken Seiling said.

Many U.S. cities have adopted living wage policies but no Canadian city has embraced it.

jouthit@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/401791 (http://news.therecord.com/article/401791)


Regional councillors not ready for living-wage policy

October 22, 2008
Frances Barrick
RECORD STAFF

WATERLOO REGION - It will be at least a year before Waterloo regional council decides whether it will adopt a living-wage policy for people doing business with the region.

Yesterday, councillors agreed to spend $52,500 to hire a consultant and planner to a do an in-depth study of the ramifications of adopting such a policy. It is expected to take a year to complete.

"I need a lot more information before I make a decision," Coun. Jim Wideman of Kitchener said in supporting a thorough review of the issue.

Under a living-wage policy, people working for the region, either on staff or on contract, would have to be paid at least $13.62 an hour. Regional employees already earn this hourly rate, but some contracted employees, such as janitors, do not.

Ontario's minimum wage is $8.75, and will rise to $10.25 in 2010.

While 125 cities in the United States have some form of living-wage policy, no Canadian municipality has adopted the principle. Waterloo Region could be the first.

Coun. Tom Galloway of Kitchener said there is some "angst" in the community about a policy, which is why it's essential councillors have all the facts before proceeding.

Coun. Sean Strickland of Waterloo said a living wage would only pertain to people doing business with the region.

"We have no capacity or ability to impose a living wage for the entire community," Strickland said.

Some of the issues the study will consider include:

Whether companies should be required to pay a living wage to its employees as a term of its contract with the region, or whether the region give preference in the bidding process to companies that pay living wages

The impact of a living wage for non-profits businesses and for-profit businesses

The impact on unions

Whether a living wage would affect economic development or competitiveness

The multiplier effect on other businesses if the region adopted a living-wage policy.

The study would include a survey of some of the region's contractors, as well as consultation with anti-poverty groups, local municipalities, employer associations and the chambers of commerce.

The study is to be completed September 2009. Council will then decide whether it wants to implement a living-wage policy.

fbarrick@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/432300 (http://news.therecord.com/article/432300)


Region wants public opinion on concept of 'living wage'

April 01, 2009
Frances Barrick
RECORD STAFF

WATERLOO REGION - Regional councillors agreed yesterday to gauge public opinion on the concept of a living wage.

"By engaging in community consultation, it doesn't mean we are adopting a living wage," Coun. Sean Strickland, chair of council's community services committee, told councillors.

And if the discussion by councillors yesterday is any indication, adopting a living wage policy for Waterloo regional government will be a hard sell.

Four regional councillor voted against the public consultation process, some saying no more time should be spent by staff studying an issue they oppose.

"I am becoming more and more concerned that we are being drawn into this. There is an assumption that we are going to do it," said Count. Jane Brewer of Cambridge, adding she is opposed to a living wage.

A living wage is the amount of money a single adult working full-time would need to live above the poverty line.

Locally, the living wage is $13.62 an hour without benefits. This is higher than Ontario's minimum wage of $9.50 an hour.

The region is the second municipality to study a living wage. Last month, Calgary became the first Canadian city government to adopt such a policy for its employees.

The region has been studying the concept for about a year. Public consultation is the last stage and will include public meetings and surveys. Council is slated to decide this fall whether to adopt a living wage policy.

Council will present four options to the public which are:

* Do nothing

* Implement a living wage for regional employees only. Like Calgary, this would be a symbolic move as regional employees already earn more than $13.62 an hour.

* Give preference to companies wanting to do business with the region to those that pay a living wage.

* Make it mandatory for companies to pay a living wage if they want to get regional business.

The last two options would cost regional taxpayers between $644,500 and $829,500 to pay 200 people, representing 70 per cent of all service work contracted by the region, a living wage, according to a regional staff report.

Currently, security guards working at regional buildings earn living wages, but employees who provide services such as housekeeping, cafeteria and groundskeeping make less than $13.62 an hour.

Brice Balmer, of Opportunities Waterloo Region, an anti-poverty group that asked regional council to study living wage, told councillor yesterday that there is a lot of "misinformation floating around the region about what living wage is."

A living wage would only pertain to the regional government, he said. It is not a rate that businesses in the region must pay their employees, unless they do business with the region.

But a living wage benefits the region in less reliance on food hampers and social assistance, he said.

"It is taking people out of poverty so the demand for social services decreases," added Linda Terry, executive director of the Social Planning Council of Cambridge.

fbarrick@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/513184 (http://news.therecord.com/article/513184)

Spokes
01-06-2010, 06:57 PM
Recapping:

Regional councillors told to adopt a living-wage policy

September 23, 2009
By Frances Barrick, Record staff

Speaker after speaker urged Waterloo regional councillors Wednesday to adopt a living-wage policy for regional employees and people who do business with the region.

“It is a moral issue,” said Jane Breithaupt, urging councillors to show how caring the region is by freeing people from hunger.

Breithaupt was one of eight speakers who applauded the region’s proposal to implement a living wage of $13.62 an hour. This is higher than Ontario’s minimum wage of $9.50 an hour.

Mike Connolly, a former regional councillor and strong advocate of cutting taxes, was the lone opponent.

“It is grossly unfair to ask regional taxpayers to subsidize private firms,” Connolly said.

A living wage is the amount of money a single adult working full-time would need to live above the poverty line. The hourly rate of $13.62 amounts to an annual salary of $21,320.

The policy would pertain to regional employees and people who do business with the region, such as contracted janitorial services.

The region spends about $3.2 million a year on about 600 contracts, including janitorial, cafeteria and grounds-keeping services. About 150 contractors pay less than a living wage, a regional report said.

It would cost between $664,500 and $829,500 to pay about 200 employees, representing 70 per cent of contracted service work, a living wage, the report said.

Council is expected to decide later this fall or early next year whether to implement a living wage policy.

While 140 American cities have some form of living-wage policies, no Canadian municipality has embraced it. Waterloo Region could be the first.

Four options before council are:

Do nothing or defer implementing a living-wage policy.

Adopt a living-wage policy for all non-student regional employees, and develop an education program encouraging other employers in the region to adopt a similar policy.

Give preference to bidders on regional contractors that pay a living wage to employees working at regional facilities.

Make it mandatory for contractors hired by the region to pay a living wage to employers working at regional facilities.

Most of the speakers urged council to adopt the last option.

Sean Zister, co-owner of Seven Shores Urban Market and Café in Waterloo, said he owes the success of his business to paying his nine employees a living wage. The result has been a “very positive, friendly working environment,” and committed, productive staff.

Cherly Ives, of Opportunities Waterloo Region, an anti-poverty group that asked regional council two years ago to consider implementing a living-wage policy, said she understands it is hard for some businesses to pay higher wages in these tough economic times.

“The thing is we should all try living on minimum wage. That is hard,” Ives said.

Peter Thurley, president of the Kitchener Centre NDP riding association and a salesperson, urged council to show leadership in this issue.

“When the region takes the lead, other businesses will follow,” he said.

“I say, ‘Let’s go for it. Let’s do it.’ ”

fbarrick@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/602349 (http://news.therecord.com/article/602349)


Regional council urged to adopt living wage

December 04, 2009
By Frances Barrick, Record staff

A staff report is urging Waterloo regional council to begin planning the implementation of a living wage for regional employees and to give preference on regional contracts to bidders that pay a living wage.

This report, urging that council adopt a living wage of $13.62 an hour for its nonstudent employees, will be before regional councillors on Jan. 5 for consideration.

Regional Chair Ken Seiling declined to comment Friday, saying he has not read the staff report.

A living wage is the amount of money a single adult working full time would require to live above the poverty line. The hourly rate of $13.62 amounts to an annual salary of $21,320.

The staff report recommends giving preference on regional contracts to bidders that pay a living wage to employees working at regional facilities.

The region spends about $3.2 million a year for about 600 contracts, including janitorial, cafeteria and groundskeeping services. About 150 contractors pay less than a living wage.

It would cost between $664,500 and $829,500 to pay about 200 employees, representing 70 per cent of contracted service work, a living wage, earlier staff reports said.

Since regional staff, excluding students, currently makes more than $13.62 an hour, there would be no cost to implementing this policy for staff.

Staff is recommending the adoption of a living wage based on feedback from the community.

At a public meeting last September, all but one of eight speakers urged council to become the first Canadian municipality to adopt a living wage. Over 140 American cities have adopted some form of living-wage policies.

Previously, staff presented council with four options:

Do nothing or defer implementing a living-wage policy.

Adopt a living-wage policy for all nonstudent regional employees, and develop an education program encouraging other employers in the region to adopt a similar policy.

Give preference to bidders on regional contractors that pay a living wage to people working at regional facilities.

Make it mandatory for contractors hired by the region to pay a living wage to people working at regional facilities.

Staff is recommending the third option to councillors.

fbarrick@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/639629 (http://news.therecord.com/article/639629)


Region’s living-wage proposal draws praise and criticism

December 30, 2009
By Frances Barrick, Record staff

The Kitchener-Waterloo Chamber of Commerce says it is bad timing for Waterloo regional council to consider a living-wage policy for its employees and bidders on contracted work.

An anti-poverty group says the regional government has a responsibility to lead by example by introducing a living wage of $13.62 an hour for its non-student employees as a poverty-reduction initiative.

On Tuesday, regional councillors will be considering a staff report urging them to implement a living wage for regional employees and to give preference on regional contracts to bidders that pay a living wage.

The region could be the first Canadian municipality to adopt a living wage. More than 140 American cities have adopted some form of living-wage policies.

“We are not supportive of the living-wage proposal at this time,” said Art Sinclair, vice-president of the Greater Kitchener-Waterloo Chamber of Commerce.

“The (regional) government has a responsibility to its people to try and emulate the things that it wants in the community,” and that includes paying a wage that people can live on without having to go to food banks, said Cheryl Ives of Opportunities Waterloo Region, an anti-poverty group that asked regional council two years ago to implement a living-wage policy.

A living wage is the amount of money a single adult working full time would require to live above the poverty line. The hourly rate of $13.62 amounts to an annual salary of $21,320.

Initially, there was some confusion surrounding living wage, as some people thought the region was setting a minimum wage businesses in the region must pay their employees. Only the provincial government has the authority to set minimum wages.

Ontario’s minimum wage is $9.50 an hour. It increases to $10.25 an hour on March 31.

Regional employees make more than $13.62 an hour, so this policy’s greatest impact would be on services that the region contracts out.

The staff report recommends giving preference on regional contracts to bidders that pay a living wage to employees working at regional facilities.

The region spends about $3.2 million a year for about 600 contracts, including janitorial, cafeteria and groundskeeping services. About 150 contractors pay less than a living wage.

If adopted by council, the policy would take effect in 2011.

The financial impact of a living wage still needs to be determined, but an earlier staff report pegged the cost at between $664,500 and $829,500 to pay about 200 employees, representing 70 per cent of contracted service work, a living wage.

Sinclair said the economic uncertainty of the past two years presented unprecedented challenges to local businesses, and the implementation of a living wage is not recommended at this time.

“Local businesses have expressed concern over their ability to absorb additional costs either directly through the tendering process or potential tax increases as the result of higher regional labour costs,” the chamber said in a Dec. 17 letter to regional Chair Ken Seiling.

“I think generally, there is a concern that increased wages will result in higher property taxes,” Sinclair added.

The Wellesley and District Board of Trade also wrote council voicing its opposition.

Ives said she is not surprised that the chamber is opposed to a living wage as it is the goal of businesses to maximize profits at the expense of minimizing costs, such as wages.

But she said local businesses that have implemented a living wage say their employees are more productive, there is less staff turnover and morale is high.

Two goals of the region are to reduce poverty and incur prosperity for the community. The living wage achieves both, Ives said.

“If what we are trying to build is prosperity, then it should be prosperity for everyone and that can’t be done with people living on minimum wage,” she said.

Previously, staff presented council with four options:

Do nothing or defer implementing a living-wage policy.

Adopt a living-wage policy for all non-student regional employees, and develop an education program encouraging other employers in the region to adopt a similar policy.

Give preference to bidders on regional contracts who pay a living wage to people working at regional facilities.

Make it mandatory for contractors hired by the region to pay a living wage to people working at regional facilities.

Regional staff is recommending the third option.

Ives said while she prefers option four, she called the third option a “good step forward.”

“It is a starting place,” she said.

fbarrick@therecord.com

http://news.therecord.com/article/649754 (http://news.therecord.com/article/649754)

Spokes
01-06-2010, 07:00 PM
Committee votes to defer living-wage decision

January 06, 2010
By Frances Barrick

WATERLOO REGION — It will be up to the regional council members elected this fall to decide whether Waterloo Region has a living-wage policy for its regional employees and contractors who do work for the region.

Regional councillors voted 8-7 Tuesday to defer a staff recommendation to the 2010-2014 regional council.

“I see a real split in the community on this issue and real uncertainty as to what this would mean,” said Regional Chair Ken Seiling, who made the motion that the issue be deferred to the next council, which would oversee the implementation and funding of a living wage if approved.

But if the majority of the 16 regional councillors are re-elected in the municipal election in October, there is little chance a living wage would be adopted as only a few councillors spoke in favour of it on Tuesday.

“I can’t support it,” said Coun. Tom Galloway of Kitchener, who said he’s opposed to property taxes being used to correct economic disparities.

Many councillors said it is the responsibility of the provincial government, not regional council, to set minimum wages. Others said the timing is not right for a living wage, considering the local economic downturn.

A living wage is the amount of money a single adult working full-time would need to live above the poverty line. Opportunities Waterloo Region, an anti-poverty group, calculated a living wage of $13.62 an hour based on the local cost of food, housing, transportation and other expenses.

Regional staff is recommending that council adopt a living wage of $13.62 an hour, without benefits, for its non-student employees, and to give preference on regional contracts to bidders who pay a living wage.

While no Canadian municipality has adopted living-wage policies, more than 140 American cities have some form of the policy.

The region spends about $3.2 million a year for about 600 contracts, including janitorial, cafeteria and groundskeeping services. About 150 contractors pay less than $13.62 an hour.

It would cost from $664,500 to $829,500 more in contractual costs to pay a living wage to about 200 employees, representing 70 per cent of contracted service work, earlier staff reports said. Since regional employees, excluding students, currently make more than $13.62 an hour, there would be no cost to implement this policy for staff.

If approved, a living wage would not be implemented until 2011.

Coun. Claudette Millar of Cambridge was the only councillor who spoke in favour of adopting a living wage at this time.

Millar said the region contracts out work because it does not want to pay regional wages to people to clean their washrooms, operate their cafeterias or tend to their grounds.

“We may not want to admit that,” she said.

Millar said the region has a responsibility to ensure that people doing work for the region should be paid a living wage, and she urged fellow councillors not to defer the decision.

Kim Denouden, mayor of North Dumfries Township, said she’s opposed to leaving it to the next council to decide the issue.

“I feel it is passing the buck,” she said.

“I cannot support a living wage. It is not our jurisdiction. It should be handled by the province,” she added.

Woolwich Township Mayor Bill Strauss said he would vote against a living wage if re-elected.

Coun. Sean Strickland of Waterloo said while he supports the concept of a living wage as an innovative way to deal with poverty, he also acknowledged that the current economic climate may not support it.

“It is not a cop-out,” Strickland said of the deferral motion.

Cheryl Ives of Opportunities Waterloo Region, which asked regional council two years ago to implement a living-wage policy, said the deferral keeps the proposal alive for another day and gives the group more time to educate the public about the benefits of a living wage.

“It is an election year and there is work to be done to educate the public,” Ives said in an interview.

And she urged people in support of the concept to contact regional councillors before the deferral goes to council for final approval on Jan. 13.

Ives said there is still confusion surrounding living wage, as some people think the region would be imposing a minimum wage on local businesses. Only the provincial government has the authority to set minimum wages. A living wage would only pertain to regional employees and people who do business with the region.

Earlier, Ives told councillors that the community is lucky that people are willing to clean washrooms, prepare food and keep grounds nice. “We are lucky that people will do these jobs at all, and even luckier that they do them so cheaply,” she said.

“It must be tempting, when faced with unpleasant work, to find ways to milk the system to avoid working. But not these people. They want to work, and they work hard. Just because we can get away with paying them less than the basic cost of living in our region doesn’t mean that we should,” Ives said.

But many of these people are immigrants, victims of abuse or neglect, and are grateful for any work, she said.

Taking advantage of people’s dire circumstances backfires because these poorly paid people have to rely on food banks and social assistance to survive, she said.

“Poverty is a difficult problem. No one solution will fix it. We need to tackle it from lots of angles, in lots of ways, and try things out, because what we’ve been doing isn’t working,” Ives said, adding that living wage is one of those innovative solutions to poverty.

Mike Connolly, a former regional councillor and strong advocate of cutting taxes, said adopting a living wage only hurts taxpayers.

“Push the provincial government to raise minimum wages. It is not fair to ask regional taxpayers to do it,” he said.

Looks like we've got a hot button issue for this coming municipal election (http://www.wonderfulwaterloo.com/showthread.php/37-Region-of-Waterloo-Municipal-Elections-2010)